1997 was a sad year for most of England: Princess Diana Died, we
gave Hong Kong back to China, the Teletubbies
first came on TV, Elton John got knighted and Tony Blair came into power (he
was rubbish). Being an apple cheek young child of tender years I didn't pay the
slightest bit of notice to any of this (though I did give my mum a hug when she
cried over Diana) but for me this year was even worse, this year marked the
release of the Fright Knights, I shudder at the memory.
For those who don’t know (lucky you) Fright Knights were the final
faction to be released for the classic Castle sets we all know and love. Yes
Fright Knights can class itself as a member of the same family that produced
Forestmen, Falcons, Black Knights and all the other wonderful LEGO factions
from the 80’s and 90’s, clearly Classic Castle had been suck a little too long
in its own gene pool however as this new offspring is a sad mutated parody of
those noble factions of yesteryear.
Please don’t miss understand me, this child looks ok, sure his
ears are a little too big, he’s missing a few teeth and his eyes are blank
vacant orbs of despair, but there is a clear family resemblance; no, the problem
lies deeper on a more subconscious level, Fright Knights is just inherently
wrong.
Ok, I’m sorry, I’m going to drop the metaphor now (it was running
a little thin) and just start explaining this faction.
Fright Knights featured an evil couple by the names of Basil the
Bat Lord and Willa the Witch, now it has never been confirmed if their relationship
was anything other than professional but I like to think there was something
going on in that tall juniorised tower of theirs. After all it would explain
why Basil was the first Minifig the come with a frown rather than a smile (I’m
joking of course I Love my partner).
New elements for this wave come in the form of new torso prints, a
new bat helm, a crystal ball, a bat fig, and best of all, the chain piece we
all love nowadays. They also repainted the Green Dragon from the Dragon Masters
theme with a nice coat of black and gave him the name Draco; this theme also
stole the broomstick piece from the Fabuland line.
This faction had castles, catapults, hot air balloons (kinda), flying
machines(not as cool as they sound) and carriages; they also liked to pick
fights with their two most modern of rivals (Dark Forest and Royal Knights) but
these other factions never appeared in any great number. This faction also had
a very large number of impulse sets.
Impulse
Set Name = Fire Cart 2538
Piece Count = 20
Year Released = 1998
Set Name = Flying Machine 2539
Piece Count = 21
Year Released = 1998
Number two in the Shell list. Ok, what? I don’t know what to say
about this, silly, very silly, for shame LEGO, however I do like the shiny
sword and would probably get this just for that. Here is a classic example of
the ‘wrongness’ surrounding this faction.
Set Name = Catapult Cart 2540
Piece Count = 28
Year Released = 1998
The third promotional set and thank goodness it’s not another
flying machine. This set is ok, the catapults a little blocky, I’m not sure
what it’s supposed to fire (those yellow studs?), the man has no weapons and it
has the look of a set my little brother would build from spare brick, but other
than that it’s ok (in which I mean to say ‘yay, not a flying machine’).
Set Name = Flying Machine 2848
Piece Count = 19
Year Released = 1997
Same name, same silliness, different set, this one doesn’t even
have wings, how does it fly? Magic? Is it a jet? Ok I have to stop laughing and
be serious for a moment, a new fig and a shiny sword doesn’t make it a good
LEGO set, this is so random and it’s a shame LEGO put time and effort into this
type of thing when they could have given us almost anything else and it would
have been better.
Set Name = Witch and Fireplace
Piece Count = 19
Year Released = 1997
Thank you, a witch, a fireplace and a nice number of accessories (including
a cat!) this is a set I can get behind. There is nothing wrong whatsoever with
this set, it’s actually really good and both the really successful Castle Lines
of the modern age have included something similar (except both had wizards
instead of a witch), that fireplace has sat in my Crusaders Mountain Fortress
for the majority of the last decade and it’s a nice early example of LEGO
designing some furniture. What I don’t get is way LEGO didn’t make more sets
like this rather than the atrocious promo sets above.
Set Name = Crossbow Cart 6004 and 6006
Piece Count = 20
Year Released = 1997
Here we have an example of another good impulse set; the amount of
weaponry with it is stunning and the fig is useful to bulk out the troops of
your army. Another siege weapon but at least it can’t fly.
Set Name = Treasure Cart 6028 and 6029
Piece Count = 22
Year Released = 1998
This is the final impulse set for Fright Knights, it’s a standard
model that we have seen before but that comment is not supposed to be detrimental.
I would have liked a shield to be included and for the chest to be filled with treasure
(rather than two yellow gems) but other than there’s nothing wrong with the set,
the figs ok and a chest is always useful, average would be a good description of
this build.
Small
Set Name = Bat Lord 6007
Piece Count = 12
Year Released = 1997
Anyone want a Dragon Army? Well this is a brilliant way to get it,
I love the old style Dragon fig and this set made the Black one very accessible
(you even get a flame element to show him breathing fire). Aside from that you
also get a cape, shiny sword, a bat and another Bat Lord. It’s more a minifigs pack
than a set but if you like those figs you can’t go wrong.
Set Name = Fright Force 6031
Piece Count = 30
Year Released = 1998
This set is the minifigs-pack and again it’s rather nice, I would
rather have five figs than a horse but I can appreciate the inclusion, just as
I like the fair amount of weapons, nice figure variety, the red feather, the flag
and the witch’s crystal ball, overall not bad.
Set Name = Bat Lord’s catapult
Piece Count = 55
Year Released = 1997
Another set that to me highlights the ‘wrongness’ of Fright
Knights, sure the cart looks ok but why is that bat riding on the horse, why is
the catapult just a barrel, what are those fire pieces doing? The whole design
looks ok at first but feels like a set my little brother would design after I
had made the basic structure for him, I can’t decide if LEGO was being patronising
to children or just lazy with the set designs.
Set Name = Witch’s Windship 6037
Piece Count = 56
Year Released = 1997
This is possibly my most hated Castle Set from the 90’s and 80’s
combined. It’s silly, ugly, poorly designed and makes no sense, witches fly on brooms;
they don’t steal Dragon from the Dragon Masters. The dragon breaks off quite
often and the rigging is not stable, I also dislike the halberds on the front
and what I can only describe as tail-lights at the back, my other big gripe is
what would I use it for? It’s pointless and the hull is just one large circular
brick piece so we don’t even get a large build to enjoy. The only thing I like
about this set is the figs and parts (dragon, witch, broom, cape, ect.) that is
not enough for a set.
Medium
Set Name = Traitor Transport 6047 and
6099
Piece Count = 139
Year Released = 1997
Interestingly enough this set came with a cave in the US (see
below); sadly I do not have the cave so I can only speculate, however I think
the idea is clever (a cave for the Dragon finally), though in the picture it
looks like the Bat Lord is sacrificing the Traitor to the Dragon.
As for the set itself I am
in two minds, the design looks solid and I like that the cage can lift out, but
I really dislike all the wings, trans-yellow bricks, the big red roof and the
way it attaches to the Dragon. I like the inclusion of the barding for the
horse and the fig who I can only assume is a Black Knight, but by this time I
am board of the Bat Lord Fig (he’s everywhere).
This set has a ‘hit or miss’ value to it I am not sure if I like
it or not, I will say that its one of the better Fright Knight sets but that is
not the highest of praise.
Set Name = Witch’s Magic Manor 6087
Piece Count = 250
Year Released = 1997
Now before we make judgments on this set I as you to pause and
consider this one comment, ‘it only ‘Looks’ like a random assortment of black
bricks, grey bricks and BURP’s because the witch herself put a magical spell
over it’. All we need to do is kiss the frog (I could be confusing my fairy
tales at this point) and the curse will be broken and before our eyes this set
(if you can call it that) will transform to something more akin to the Magical
Workshop or one of the houses from the MMV.
Have you considered that? Ok I know its wishful thinking but this
set is defiantly not what made LEGO great, it horrible, the baseplate is too
thick, there’s way to many BURPS, the colour scheme is ugly and the play elements
are rubbish; you get a skeleton that can spin round from a wall and a stone
trap that has nothing clever about it (seriously the stone on a chain drops
when you detach it from the wall manually, no clever pulley system or
anything). As for the design there a big open gap at the back so the trap is
useless anyway and there’s nothing inside the building other than a little
witch’s corner on the second floor and 70% of the construction is BURP’s, eurgh.
Ohh and if that wasn’t enough we also get a helicopter,
great. I regretted getting this set
which is a very rare occurrence; I will say that if this is one of your
treasured sets from your childhood then go and treat yourself to one of the
most expensive castle sets you can find from the early 90’s as you deserve a
treat after years of torment.
Large
Set Name = Night Lord’s Castle 6097
Piece Count = 601
Year Released = 1997
As much as I dislike the Manor, I find myself unusually drawn
towards this set, it has its problems its design is lacking somewhat, these
gaps and holes all over the place but there is just something so fun in
watching this set slowly reach out towards the skies . I get that same childish
rush of joy when I build this set just a I would when I splash in a puddle
(come on we all do it occasionally), this set fires off some long forgotten pleasure
synapse in my mind that comes from building stupidly impractical things from
LEGO, each floor added is another little thrill.
As for the set itself, it is by no means a groundbreaker and it is
way too ugly to do anything other than build it and then dismantle and I would
never leave this one out on display. It is also one of the sets I would happily
give to a smaller LEGO fan (someone of five or six) to keep them busy when their
parents come round to visit and we need to keep them quite, I don’t feel particularly
attached to this set (small people however cannot touch my Forestmen).
I will also say that as a parts collection you do get quite a good
deal, a fair number of figs, a cool flag, a dragon, two horses, a skeleton,
bats, fire, chains, shields, weapons, a magic scroll, ect... However once it’s
been first built any LEGO collector with any talent will mod it in a hundred
tiny ways to improve it; why didn’t the LEGO designers do this in the first
place?
If any of you are still in the mood for Fright Knights after
reading this overview I will say this is the best one to get, its big, it’s
dumb but its fun.
Set Name = LEGO Dacta Castle 9376
Piece Count = 321
Year Released = 1997
This isn’t a set exactly it’s more of a huge bits box (which I don’t
own) but I thought it would be good to include it here. If something like this
came out now I would be all over it and to include 14 figs is just wonderful
(two of each). This type of thing is very handy to use on an already existing
castle to make it even bigger.
Am I Biased?
Ok reading back over this review I can see that I haven’t been the
fairest individual, I feel the need to point out that what I say is only an
opinion, you are perfectly welcome to disagree and some of these sets might
mean more to you than me because you have had a different experience with them.
So I will say now I am biased against Fright Knights, as a child I
only had a couple of the smaller sets (including the windship) and when I
started doing the research for these guys I spent quite a bit of my own money
on sets I really didn’t feel were worth it. This is all from a modern
perspective with the benefit of comparison, I will compare these guys to all
the sets that came before because I except LEGO to get better, I except them to
take what was done and improve on that. With these sets I see little of that,
the designs are basic and the whole idea behind the faction feels lazy, we had
knights and wizard and dragons before.
To me LEGO Castle lost its way a little over this time, I feel
like they took all the good castle designers and sent them off to make Western
and Adventure sets instead, don’t get me wrong I love those themes and when I
finally get round to doing those faction overviews you will hear a fair amount
of praise for the set design, but that design is lacking from these guys, it’s as
simple as that.
Thank you for taking the time to read this next faction on the
chopping black ‘Knights Kingdoms I’.
Good work and you are spot on, Fright knights were terrible. Give me falcons TLG!
ReplyDeleteUgh, you are right, some of these sets look horrible, like the witches manor, no way is that a manor, its just a random collection of bricks! Its such a shame because the title 'witch's magic manor sounds so exciting!
ReplyDeleteAlso i just noticed, why is there a minifigure randomly holding dragon wings? Did he just pinch them off the dragon? Does he believe they will actually make him fly? Ahhhh, too many questions!!
ReplyDeleteHaha, 1997 was a sad year for most of England: we gave Hong Kong back to China.
ReplyDeleteI am also sad too, China is not good at the lead of Hong Kong, many bad things after 1997 in Hong Kong, Economic Depression, 2003 SARS, H5N1 Disease.
I am very enjoy before 1997, many memorable before 1997. Christopher Francis Patten - our good governor. I am from Hong Kong, but I like England.
Spot on with this write-up. You are saying what the majority of us were thinking when these came out. 6007 and 6027 were the only sets I have acquired from this era (second lowest only to the jelly beans) and I am ashamed to admit that in public. If nothing else, the late 90s were the time of BURPs which is what brought things to such a low point. Looking forward to you getting to the Fantasy Era ('cuz Kingdoms... sigh).
ReplyDeletePS: Not to be "that guy" but you have a near howler of a typo.
"clearly Classic Castle had been suck a little too long in its own gene poll"
Good stuff keep up the good work!
ReplyDeleteThanks Steve. I do agree with your review on the Fright Knights. This faction is really a let down to the previous castle factions like the black falcons, black knights and the foresten. In fact, I only bought 6007 & 6027 despite I had more savings at that age :p I guess this was one of the reasons why I went into the "dark ages" where I stopped buying lego sets. haha. But I'm happy with the many impressive lego factions before the Fright Knights :)
ReplyDeleteThank you for this interesting review on such an 'uninteresting' faction. Deeply appreciate your hard work! keep it up!
Hi Nat
ReplyDeleteHa too many questions indeed, this faction was a shameful time in LEGO history, its best not to delve too deeply for fear of what we might uncover.
Hi Matthew
Thanks for the comparison from the other side of the globe it made me laught, thanks always for commenting and reading on this blog :)
Hi Yiqun
Thanks for continualy commenting and reading, as I said in the review I have to compare these guys to what came before because thats the way things were. I am hearing more and more that it was with faction that sent so many of us into our 'dark age, for that I almost can't forgive them.There are so many sets I missed out on in the mid 2000s because these guys made me give up on LEGO :(
To everyone else thank you for reading and the comments they really keep me going, ohh and I have changed the typo :)
I remember when these came out as I was just getting out of Lego. Didn't own any of these, your review brought back memories of my initial impressions as a kid. Added you to my RSS feed - keep it up!
ReplyDeleteI was about 12 years old when the fright nights set came out. I remember sitting down in front of the Night Lord's Castle at the store each time we went, and my parents wouldn't buy it for me.
ReplyDeleteThen one day they didn't just buy the castle, but the entire set and even a few extra of the little sets that go with it. It was waiting for me in the middle of my room in a big pile when I got off school one day. It was incredible, I loved that set and kept the night lord's castle for years until a friend knocked it over and it fell into a million pieces :cry:
Ended up boxing up the whole set and giving it to an older friend's young kid. Had a lot of other sets too, the underwater set from about the same year was another I really liked, had the whole set of that too.
I got the Witch's Magic Manor and Bat Lord for Christmas when I was 10 years old and they were the final Castle themed Legos I ever had, certainly the end of an era. At the time I actually liked these sets, but looking back I agree they were a mess compared to the ones in years past. I thought they were entertaining though and brought some neat ideas and pieces. I actually do like the Magic Manor, it isn't similar to any of the other castles. These weren't nearly as good as the Dragon Masters sets though.
ReplyDeleteI never noticed it before, but in the alternate build of 6087 they switched the witch and dark forestman's heads! Magic Spell?
ReplyDeleteThat's the scariest part of the set.
Delete"After all it would explain why Basil was the first Minifig the come with a frown rather than a smile" <-LMAO. Great post.
ReplyDeleteI didn't mind the Fright Knights so much. The only real complaint I had was those stupid blocky baseplates. I liked the tower idea for their castle; although, it could have been pulled off better.
Deletehey don't dis Fright Knights! :P well i admit the sets we're not really that well made but as was proved in Lego Universe; BAT LORDS ARE AWESOME
ReplyDeletedon't foget that! :P
"Quick Robin, Willa the Witch stole the Bat-Copter!"
ReplyDeleteI do miss all these small set, which I keep buying when young to accumulate my minifigure!
ReplyDeleteI didn't much care for this theme, but it was mostly because I preferred just the regular old knights. All that mystical magical stuff just wasn't for me. Of course by 97/98 I was about to enter my teens, and had pretty much given up the whole Lego thing by then. The only reason I know the sets at all is because my little brother got a few of the sets, but I was never too impressed. I do feel you're being a little harsh on the Night Lord's Castle set. Just look at how tall that tower is? It's great!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that this line had some of the ugliest sets in all Lego Castle history. I won't be too hard on the polybag style sets, as even tho the flying mashines look stupid, they at least offer good useful pieces (esspecially weapons). The catapult cart however I feel like is really bad, as it basicly misses out on anything that makes a impulsive set good. Noone buys impulsives for the model, more for the cool parts and weaponary. Both this set severly lacks and the only redeeming factor is the figure, but given how overused the Batlord is in all those sets, that also falls flat.
ReplyDeleteNow the ugliest set ever, the witches gondula/whatever is just so so so ugly. I actually like the general idea of the set with the dragon... But it just doesn't do anything in the design department.
The witches mansion also feels like a random selection of big pieces and another ugly flying whatever. But come to think of it, you know what might've been clever? Calling the knight lords castle "Witches Magic Mansion", I mean look at its design, it wouldve make more sense to be a mansion than a castle given all the defensive design flaws for a castle.
It can be seen that the online gambling %d0%b8%d0%b3%d1%80%d0%be%d0%b2%d1%8b%d0%b5 site casino is ready. Providing a full promote for every players requires lonesome a few steps to easily apply for online gambling site casino. You can con online sports betting, or online casinos, and undertaking genuine child support games easily. There is afterward a teaching system for supplementary players who have never met before, even if you are a beginner, you can become a master of Gaining. https://918kiss2020.com/tag/%d0%b8%d0%b3%d1%80%d0%be%d0%b2%d1%8b%d0%b5/
ReplyDeleteHaloo pak^^
ReplyDeleteKami dari SENTANAPOKER ingin menawarkan pak^^
Untuk saat ini kami menerima Deposit Melalui Pulsa ya pak.
*untuk minimal deposit 10ribu
*untuk minimal Withdraw 25ribu
*untuk deposit pulsa kami menerima provider
-XL
-Telkomsel
untuk bonus yang kami miliki kami memiliki
*bonus cashback 0,5%
*bunus refferal 20%
*bonus gebiar bulanan (N-max,samsung Note 10+,Iphone xr 64G,camera go pro 7hero,Apple airpods 2 ,dan freechips)
Daftar Langsung Di:
SENTANAPOKER
Kontak Kami;
WA : +855 9647 76509
Line : SentanaPoker
Wechat : SentanaPokerLivechat Sentanapoker
Proses deposit dan withdraw tercepat bisa anda rasakan jika bermain di Sentanapoker. So… ? tunggu apa lagi ? Mari bergabung dengan kami. Pelayanan CS yang ramah dan Proffesional dan pastinya sangat aman juga bisa anda dapatkan di Sentanapoker.
I feel like some of those sets are lacking yes but I personally like fright knights cause like.a bat lord a witch instead of wizard. with the second flying machine yes it was magic in case you didn't notice the which and the wand and the Crystal ball on it. so overall I think the fright knights are a good theme I think its because I like Halloween vintage Lego and bats.
ReplyDeleteI've made mistakes in the comment before so I'm doing a redo. In my opinion the fright knights were good but I'm young and think that the back in that time Lego was creative and licensed themes took over before I was born so a taste of the past seems so exciting. But I've always liked bats and Halloween so the fright knights are right up my ally. But Crystal balls,castles and bat themed knights aren't everyone's cup of tea. your opinion made sense and I see why you don't like them but I do. So take another look and think would someone like me enjoy something like that.��
ReplyDelete